The museum consists of five stories, each filled with art pieces of very minimalistic and clean presentation. I really liked the architecture and design of the museum itself, especially since I really enjoy working on design work of my own and keep up with a lot of web design trends. I have to admit though, for a lot of the pieces presented there, I questioned the qualifications for what determined what got to be presented there and what didn't. Sometimes it seemed like it probably took more thought to come up with the blurb about the work than to complete the work itself, but I guess in this type of context, the blurb, or motivation and philosophy behind a work is the main part of the work itself.
Does an extravagant or profound philosophy behind a specific piece actually add value to the piece itself? Does it aid the piece in serving a greater or more effective purpose? Is it possible to have a piece that, without an articulated philosophy or motivation, cease to have a purpose?
Receives data from 30 RSS feeds and prints them as they are updated.
|
These I actually kind of liked! TypeFace memory cards!
|
Tweet